Click HERE to register

WEBINAR CONTENT DESCRIPTION:

A recent Daubert order in the Hair Relaxer MDL provides us critical guidance on the admissibility of expert testimony for the litigation. This webinar will examine the court’s analysis of the expert testimony offered by toxicologist Mr. Atwood and epidemiologist Dr. Cote, the application of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert, and the court’s treatment of dose, exposure, and the limitations of epidemiological research. Speakers will discuss the distinction between permissible scientific inferences and unreliable analytical gaps, as well as the practical implications of the ruling for expert development, motion practice, and litigation strategy.